Search for: "ARMSTRONG CORP"
Results 1 - 20
of 182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 3:47 pm
Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20, 30-32 & n.4 (1991), the court rejected Armstrong’s claims of bias of arbitration panels and said, “Like the Supreme Court, this court declines to assume either the pool of potential arbitrators, or the ultimate arbitral panel itself, will be unwilling or unable to render a conscientious decision based on the evidence before it. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:55 am
Despite that the dispute between the athlete and the Texas insurer was settled in a binding agreement eight years ago, the arbitrators stated the panel “will exercise jurisdiction to determine and make a final award resolving any disputes between or among Tailwind Sports Corp., Lance Armstrong and SCA Promotions, Inc. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 2:20 am
Meet Jennifer Armstrong-Owen, VP of People at talent platform SeekOut. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 2:04 am
Animal Feeds International Corp., 130 S.Ct. 1758 (2010) for the finding that prior use of the panel amounts to continued use of the panel. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:04 am
The defendants include Armstrong, Tailwind Sports Corp. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:34 pm
David Baumann, Main Justice, Lance Armstrong Brian Whetten, Huffington Post, Business Leadership and Murdoch's Fatal Flaw Tom HuddlestonJr., AMLaw Daily, With Internal Probe, FCPA in Mind, News Corp. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:37 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Earlier this week, the International Cycling Union announced that it would strip Lance Armstrong of his seven Tour de France titles, stating that overwhelming evidence existed that Armstrong had won those titles by doping. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 10:03 am
Target Corp., 90 F. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 6:57 am
ExxonMobil Corp., Case No. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 4:19 pm
Mississippi Riverboat Amusement Corp., 52 F.3d 560, 566 (5th Cir. 1995). [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 6:03 am
Armstrong argued that this was literally true because Armstrong includes those features unless customers decline them, but General Steel doesn’t include them unless customers ask.The advertisements at issue do not draw the fine distinction upon which Armstrong relies. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 6:17 am
Then there is the suit by Britain's Sunday Times, owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp, which has already filed legal papers over the $500,000 it paid to Armstrong in 2006 to settle a libel lawsuit “after it reprinted claims from a book in 2004 that he took performance-enhancing drugs. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 6:49 pm
A recent post on the Harvard Law School Corporate Law Blog, (on which I have published several articles as a “contributing author”) recently discussed a 2008 decision by Supreme Court Justice-Nominee Brett Kavanaugh, in Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 5:06 am
Exhibit A for today is my fellow Texan Lance Armstrong. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm
” Judge Armstrong cited Kearns v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:46 pm
Corp., 252 F.3d 1320, 1327 (Fed. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
See Armstrong v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
(patent infringement) 2/1: Armstrong World Industries Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 6:53 am
Mentor Corp., ___ Cal. [read post]
